Timeline for Collaboration with Wikipedia Reference Desk for Science (WP:RDS)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2012 at 17:43 | comment | added | Manishearth | Yeah, im planning to do that anyways.. Just something that I overlooked. | |
| Feb 16, 2012 at 17:11 | comment | added | David Z Mod | It's your call. In general you can just post things on the community promotion ad thread (as long as they're in the proper format), you don't need to solicit comments or improvements. Though for what it's worth, I think it'd be fine as is. (Making the subtext a solid color would be an improvement) | |
| Feb 16, 2012 at 7:48 | comment | added | Manishearth | Ok, thats fine with me! Should I finalise this one or wait for someone to improve/comment on it? | |
| Feb 16, 2012 at 7:39 | comment | added | David Z Mod | I think our site icon is copyrighted/trademarked by Stack Exchange under different terms from the content. You would have to get permission from the higher-ups to use it. Here "permission" may have to take the form of a legal contract, so I'm not sure it's worth it. You could use a different picture of the Higgs potential if you like, but I don't think it's necessary because a community promotion ad is supposed to promote the actual (external) thing the ad is for, not so much its connection with SE. | |
| Feb 16, 2012 at 7:27 | comment | added | Manishearth | Just for the heck of it, I was toying with the idea of making the WP logo wear a higgs mexican hat (physics.SE favicon). Thoughts? | |
| Feb 16, 2012 at 7:25 | comment | added | Manishearth | The subtext should be completely red, not red with a black border. My mistake. | |
| Feb 16, 2012 at 6:59 | history | answered | Manishearth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |