4 edited body
source | link

The community is sometimes more antagonistic, particularly against new users, as it would be reasonable. But acting too harshly against some wonderful contributors would be clearly irrational; the system is not tuned against you, it is tuned for to motivate you to provide the best possible content what you can. Thus, if an awesome contributor is maybe too antagonistic with you, the best if you try to ignore/tolerate him on the matemeta/chat. Instead, read his main site posts. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

The community is sometimes more antagonistic, particularly against new users, as it would be reasonable. But acting too harshly against some wonderful contributors would be clearly irrational; the system is not tuned against you, it is tuned for to motivate you to provide the best possible content what you can. Thus, if an awesome contributor is maybe too antagonistic with you, the best if you try to ignore/tolerate him on the mate/chat. Instead, read his main site posts. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

The community is sometimes more antagonistic, particularly against new users, as it would be reasonable. But acting too harshly against some wonderful contributors would be clearly irrational; the system is not tuned against you, it is tuned for to motivate you to provide the best possible content what you can. Thus, if an awesome contributor is maybe too antagonistic with you, the best if you try to ignore/tolerate him on the meta/chat. Instead, read his main site posts. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

3 added 629 characters in body
source | link

Mods are not always against you, even if it looks so on the first spot.

Mods are held on a short leash by the SE. Most likely he couldn't do too much wrong against you, even if he would want. The rules of the site are binding for him just as for you.

The community has some bad peopleis sometimes more antagonistic, particularly against new users, as it would be reasonable. NowBut acting too harshly against some wonderful contributors would be clearly irrational; the problemsystem is thatnot tuned against you, it is overlapping withtuned for to motivate you to provide the people posting useful commentsbest possible content what you can. You can't ban a physicist because he is pathologically hostileThus, heif an awesome contributor is maybe too valuable for that. Tryantagonistic with you, the best if you try to ignore/tolerate him on the mate/chat. Instead, and read his main site posts. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

1For example, in a facebook-group, you could have got a permanent banning from the whole group. Without any reasoning. From that, you couldn't have even read the site. The FB does it while the mean quality level of their content would be deleted on the SE in minutes as VLQ. Here you got a short chat suspension, and you can publicly challenge the mod for his decision.

Mods are held on a short leash by the SE. Most likely he couldn't do too much wrong against you, even if he would want. The rules of the site are binding for him just as for you.

The community has some bad people. Now the problem is that it is overlapping with the people posting useful comments. You can't ban a physicist because he is pathologically hostile, he is too valuable for that. Try to ignore/tolerate him, and read his main site posts. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

1For example, in a facebook-group, you could have got a permanent banning from the whole group. Without any reasoning. From that, you couldn't have even read the site. The FB does it while the mean quality level of their content would be deleted on the SE in minutes as VLQ.

Mods are not always against you, even if it looks so on the first spot.

Mods are held on a short leash by the SE. Most likely he couldn't do too much wrong against you, even if he would want. The rules of the site are binding for him just as for you.

The community is sometimes more antagonistic, particularly against new users, as it would be reasonable. But acting too harshly against some wonderful contributors would be clearly irrational; the system is not tuned against you, it is tuned for to motivate you to provide the best possible content what you can. Thus, if an awesome contributor is maybe too antagonistic with you, the best if you try to ignore/tolerate him on the mate/chat. Instead, read his main site posts. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

1For example, in a facebook-group, you could have got a permanent banning from the whole group. Without any reasoning. From that, you couldn't have even read the site. The FB does it while the mean quality level of their content would be deleted on the SE in minutes as VLQ. Here you got a short chat suspension, and you can publicly challenge the mod for his decision.

2 added 629 characters in body
source | link

This is not an SE-specific problem, since. Since the Internet exists, so is it going everywhere. The SE is actually not so bad1 - but only for the people learned it and can defend themselfes.

For example, I can say this to you publicly and nothing will happen, except that I get some downvotes which have zero effect to my reputation.2

In your specific case: it is quite possible that some people you pinged, or who has seen that you are pinging others, actually flagged your comments. If a mod intervenes, it is very likely, that he is doing it because you were flagged. The problem is that from this point it is the mods decision, how does he handle an event, - but all what he does, leaves a trace. Just as everything what you post, has a trace even if you deleted it. If there are no flags, the mod has the option to close his eyes, but if there isare, something he has to do.

It happened to me many times3 that a mod intervened against me, while it was clear to me that he is doing it against his best opinion, and the. The real cause of the trouble was the person who flagged my post. Try to not take the mods into such situations.

The result is, for example, ACM might defend that "X flagged your comment because you annoyed him" (if it so happened), but he can't do because he is not allowed to explain this. The result is that now you are attacking him and he could himself defend himself, but he can'tis not allowed to. It is another problem what you should try to avoid, try to not get them into such situations.

The community has some bad people. Now the problem is that it is overlapping with the people posting useful comments. You can't ban a physicist because he is pathologically hostile, he is too valuable for that. Try to ignore/tolerate him, and read his main site posts what you can understand,. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

You are not fighting a person, you are fighting a system, and its bad sidesaspects are the property of the internet communities in general, and not of the SE or this specific mod.

The site is driven by free contributions, everybody is writing questions and answers for free here. If a hardcore contributor dislikes you, then you are in the weaker position and you have to accustome to that (what doesn't mean that the system isn't defending also you - only it defends them more).

1For example, in a facebook-group, you could have got a permanent banning from the whole group. Without any reasoning. From that, you couldn't have even read the site. The FB does it while the mean quality level of their content would be deleted on the SE in minutes as VLQ.

2Don't worry on meta downs, they are always coming and have actually no effect.

3Not on the PSE.

This is not an SE-specific problem, since the Internet exists, so is it going everywhere. The SE is actually not so bad - but only for the people learned it and can defend themselfes.

For example, I can say this to you publicly and nothing will happen, except that I get some downvotes which have zero effect to my reputation.

In your specific case: it is quite possible that some people you pinged actually flagged your comments. If a mod intervenes, it is very likely, that he is doing it because you were flagged. The problem is that from this point the mods decision, how does he handle an event, but all what he does, leaves a trace. If there are no flags, the mod has the option to close his eyes, but if there is, something he has to do.

It happened to me many times that a mod intervened against me, while it was clear to me that he is doing it against his best opinion, and the real cause of the trouble was the person who flagged my post. Try to not take the mods into such situations.

The result is, for example, ACM might defend that "X flagged your comment because you annoyed him" (if it so happened), but he can't do because he is not allowed to explain this. The result is that now you are attacking him and he could himself defend, but he can't. It is another problem what you should try to avoid, try to not get them into such situations.

The community has some bad people. Now the problem is that it is overlapping with the people posting useful comments. You can't ban a physicist because he is pathologically hostile, he is too valuable for that. Try to ignore/tolerate him, and read his posts what you can understand, I think there is the optimum.

You are not fighting a person, you are fighting a system, and its bad sides are the property of the internet communities in general, and not of the SE or this specific mod.

The site is driven by free contributions, everybody is writing questions and answers for free here. If a hardcore contributor dislikes you, then you are in the weaker position and you have to accustome to that (what doesn't mean that the system isn't defending also you - only it defends them more).

This is not an SE-specific problem. Since the Internet exists, so is it going everywhere. The SE is actually not so bad1 - but only for the people learned it and can defend themselfes.

For example, I can say this to you publicly and nothing will happen, except that I get some downvotes which have zero effect to my reputation.2

In your specific case: it is quite possible that some people you pinged, or who has seen that you are pinging others, actually flagged your comments. If a mod intervenes, it is very likely, that he is doing it because you were flagged. The problem is that from this point it is the mods decision, how does he handle an event - but all what he does, leaves a trace. Just as everything what you post, has a trace even if you deleted it. If there are no flags, the mod has the option to close his eyes, but if there are, something he has to do.

It happened to me many times3 that a mod intervened against me, while it was clear to me that he is doing it against his best opinion. The real cause of the trouble was the person who flagged my post. Try to not take the mods into such situations.

The result is, for example, ACM might defend that "X flagged your comment because you annoyed him" (if it so happened), but he can't do because he is not allowed to explain this. The result is that now you are attacking him and he could defend himself, but he is not allowed to. It is another problem what you should try to avoid, try to not get them into such situations.

The community has some bad people. Now the problem is that it is overlapping with the people posting useful comments. You can't ban a physicist because he is pathologically hostile, he is too valuable for that. Try to ignore/tolerate him, and read his main site posts. Learn physics from him. I think there is the optimum.

You are not fighting a person, you are fighting a system, and its bad aspects are the property of the internet communities in general, and not of the SE or this specific mod.

The site is driven by free contributions, everybody is writing questions and answers for free here. If a hardcore contributor dislikes you, then you are in the weaker position and you have to accustome to that (what doesn't mean that the system isn't defending also you - only it defends them more).

1For example, in a facebook-group, you could have got a permanent banning from the whole group. Without any reasoning. From that, you couldn't have even read the site. The FB does it while the mean quality level of their content would be deleted on the SE in minutes as VLQ.

2Don't worry on meta downs, they are always coming and have actually no effect.

3Not on the PSE.

1
source | link