Timeline for Cascade of mostly trivial edits by a user
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2019 at 8:32 | comment | added | anna v | Sorry, I do not know what "UI level" is... some edits were so trivial that it looked to me, my browser is firefox, as if he/she was picking a word and rewriting it. | |
| Apr 27, 2019 at 3:55 | comment | added | Volker Siegel | That sounds like the problem may be on the UI level, right? (Which was possibly what you meant anyway). To me, it does sound like the question criticizes the kind of change as much as the interaction, though. | |
| Apr 27, 2019 at 3:47 | comment | added | anna v | on the day I entered this question I had been alerted in the comments with about 8 edits of old questions, most of them trivial, interspersed with regular comments, and had to wade through them, and after checking the first few lost track of which were checked and which not, because the checking a comment is not checked:). I do not think this history is kept. | |
| Apr 27, 2019 at 3:43 | history | edited | Volker Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 189 characters in body
|
| Apr 27, 2019 at 3:40 | comment | added | Volker Siegel | Which cascade do you mean? Not sure I can access the view you describe. | |
| Apr 27, 2019 at 3:26 | comment | added | anna v | I think the basic problem is the cascade, not the corrections. If one gets ten comments to check edits, true comments get lost in the row. Also one has to remember which comments were checked. Maybe there should be a limit to the number of edits a non-author can make in a day. | |
| Apr 27, 2019 at 2:13 | history | answered | Volker Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |