Return to Answer

As suggested, this is actually a MetaSE question, so I will self-answer it. There are some answers to this question in MetaSE: Why do we need multiple approvers for suggested edits? The reason summary was given by another comment in duplicate question of mine by @Spevacus:

The TL;DR is... Quality. It's extremely easy to hit "Approve" on an edit that might not be that great of an edit. It's less likely that two people robotically click "Approve" on a bad edit. It's much less likely that someone hits one of the improvement options and actually makes changes themselves and those end up being bad changes.

As suggested, this question is actually concerns MetaSE, so after some research I will self-answer it. There are indeed some answers to this question in MetaSE: Why do we need multiple approvers for suggested edits? The reason summary was given by another comment in duplicate question of mine by @Spevacus:

The TL;DR is... Quality. It's extremely easy to hit "Approve" on an edit that might not be that great of an edit. It's less likely that two people robotically click "Approve" on a bad edit. It's much less likely that someone hits one of the improvement options and actually makes changes themselves and those end up being bad changes.

As suggested, this is actually a MetaSE question, so I will self-answer it. There are some answers to this question in MetaSE: Why do we need multiple approvers for suggested edits? The reason summary was given by another comment in duplicate question of mine by @spervacus:

The TL;DR is... Quality. It's extremely easy to hit "Approve" on an edit that might not be that great of an edit. It's less likely that two people robotically click "Approve" on a bad edit. It's much less likely that someone hits one of the improvement options and actually makes changes themselves and those end up being bad changes.

As suggested, this is actually a MetaSE question, so I will self-answer it. There are some answers to this question in MetaSE: Why do we need multiple approvers for suggested edits? The reason summary was given by another comment in duplicate question of mine by @Spevacus:

The TL;DR is... Quality. It's extremely easy to hit "Approve" on an edit that might not be that great of an edit. It's less likely that two people robotically click "Approve" on a bad edit. It's much less likely that someone hits one of the improvement options and actually makes changes themselves and those end up being bad changes.

As suggested, this is actually a MetaSE question, so I will self close it. There are some answers to this question in MetaSE: Why do we need multiple approvers for suggested edits? The reason summary was given by another comment in duplicate question of mine:

The TL;DR is... Quality. It's extremely easy to hit "Approve" on an edit that might not be that great of an edit. It's less likely that two people robotically click "Approve" on a bad edit. It's much less likely that someone hits one of the improvement options and actually makes changes themselves and those end up being bad changes.

As suggested, this is actually a MetaSE question, so I will self-answer it. There are some answers to this question in MetaSE: Why do we need multiple approvers for suggested edits? The reason summary was given by another comment in duplicate question of mine by @spervacus:

The TL;DR is... Quality. It's extremely easy to hit "Approve" on an edit that might not be that great of an edit. It's less likely that two people robotically click "Approve" on a bad edit. It's much less likely that someone hits one of the improvement options and actually makes changes themselves and those end up being bad changes.