Timeline for "Serial downvoting" because of multiple terrible answers to the same question
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12 at 20:11 | comment | added | Sten | "I assumed knowledgeable high rep users would either downvote the terrible answers [...] but they did not." -- not really how the site works, unfortunately; people who are knowledgeable about a particular topic are vastly outnumbered by those who are not. | |
| Feb 12 at 18:47 | comment | added | Mike | "As far as I am concerned the question is a good question". I think it was when you first asked it, and I never downvoted the question itself. You really degraded its quality when you edited in a misinformed rant about serial downvoting and other comments on the answers. But the main content is an entirely fair question about physics. Your later edits were bad, but your abuse of the "answer" posts caused the bigger problem. And again, I was just trying to downvote those "answers" to that one question, which you repeatedly say you feel is the right thing to do, but the system wouldn't let me. | |
| Feb 12 at 18:41 | comment | added | Mike | "I assumed knowledgeable high rep users would either downvote the terrible answers [...] but they did not." Actually we did; we downvoted your serial "answers" to that question, because they were all non-answers full of bad physics, but the system flagged those votes related to just that one question as serial downvoting. That's the point of my question here. I never went looking for anything else you did, but all my downvotes within that one question were rejected. | |
| Feb 11 at 0:56 | history | answered | KDP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |