Timeline for Where should research-level questions go? Theoretical Physics SE or Physics Research SE?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 14, 2010 at 8:51 | comment | added | Marek | well yeah. But I don't think anyone is splitting here. There is some overlap between physics.SE and TP.SE (e.g. me) but I won't leave this site just because a new site is created. I'll ask my research level questions there and help to solve lower level questions here. I honestly don't see any problem with this. | |
Dec 13, 2010 at 23:47 | comment | added | Lukas | I am not sure why cstheory has been created, but probably because SO became too big, there are more programming related sites (SO, SF, cstheory, programmers + a few smaller). I do not say it should never split, but it should split because its too big, not too small. | |
Dec 13, 2010 at 23:32 | comment | added | Marek | You make very fine points, +1! Still, I think dichotomy like Mathoverflow/math.SE can work (and does work) very well. And I don't know about SO... is an actual research being done there? If so, why was cstheory.SE created? | |
Dec 13, 2010 at 21:59 | history | answered | Lukas | CC BY-SA 2.5 |