Skip to main content
previous caused misunderstanding
Source Link
Larry Harson
  • 5.4k
  • 13
  • 12

Firstly, I don't think there is a problem with the level ofneed to improve participation here anymore than there is one with the Math and Chemistry sites.

TheI think the problem lies with the attitude of some people who started out thinking that Physics Stack Exchange would somehow be the next Math Overflow. NoInstead, it's ended up ticking over nicely just like other popular academic sites on the Stack Exchange network, open to a wide range of people including enthusiasts.

However, if you want to "improve" participation more towards Math Over Flow level, then alienate those at the lower level by excluding them from asking questions, and banning homework questions. That way you'll improve participation of professionals , while reducing questions/day and therefore overall participation:

  • Mathematics Q&A for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields 494 questions/day

    2nd place Mathematics Q&A for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields 494 questions/day

  • MathOverflow

    17th place MathOverflow MathOverflow Q&A for professional mathematicians 42 questions/day

    MathOverflow Q&A for professional mathematicians 42 questions/day

We need to face facts,Despite physics isn'tnot being as popular as mathematics, it's still placed 9th, and the last thing we want to be doing right nowI don't think there is pushing it too far in a direction that will promoteneed to improve participation in its demise, just as for the failed Theoretical Physics site.current form:

  • 9th place Physics Q&A for active researchers, academics and students of physics 51 questions/day

I don't think there is a problem with the level of participation here anymore than there is one with the Math and Chemistry sites.

The problem lies with the attitude of some people who started out thinking that Physics Stack Exchange would somehow be the next Math Overflow. No, it's ended up ticking over nicely just like other popular academic sites on the Stack Exchange network, open to a wide range of people including enthusiasts.

However, if you want to "improve" participation more towards Math Over Flow level, then alienate those at the lower level by excluding them from asking questions, and banning homework questions. That way you'll improve participation of professionals , while reducing questions/day and therefore overall participation:

  • Mathematics Q&A for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields 494 questions/day
  • MathOverflow MathOverflow Q&A for professional mathematicians 42 questions/day

We need to face facts, physics isn't as popular as mathematics, and the last thing we want to be doing right now is pushing it too far in a direction that will promote its demise, just as for the failed Theoretical Physics site.

  • Physics Q&A for active researchers, academics and students of physics 51 questions/day

Firstly, I don't think there is a need to improve participation here anymore than with the Math and Chemistry sites.

I think the problem lies with the attitude of some people who started out thinking that Physics Stack Exchange would somehow be the next Math Overflow. Instead, it's ended up ticking over nicely just like other popular academic sites on the Stack Exchange network, open to a wide range of people including enthusiasts.

However, if you want to "improve" participation more towards Math Over Flow level, then alienate those at the lower level by excluding them from asking questions, and banning homework questions. That way you'll improve participation of professionals , while reducing questions/day and therefore overall participation:

  • 2nd place Mathematics Q&A for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields 494 questions/day

  • 17th place MathOverflow MathOverflow Q&A for professional mathematicians 42 questions/day

Despite physics not being as popular as mathematics, it's still placed 9th, and I don't think there is a need to improve participation in its current form:

  • 9th place Physics Q&A for active researchers, academics and students of physics 51 questions/day
Source Link
Larry Harson
  • 5.4k
  • 13
  • 12

I don't think there is a problem with the level of participation here anymore than there is one with the Math and Chemistry sites.

The problem lies with the attitude of some people who started out thinking that Physics Stack Exchange would somehow be the next Math Overflow. No, it's ended up ticking over nicely just like other popular academic sites on the Stack Exchange network, open to a wide range of people including enthusiasts.

However, if you want to "improve" participation more towards Math Over Flow level, then alienate those at the lower level by excluding them from asking questions, and banning homework questions. That way you'll improve participation of professionals , while reducing questions/day and therefore overall participation:

  • Mathematics Q&A for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields 494 questions/day
  • MathOverflow MathOverflow Q&A for professional mathematicians 42 questions/day

We need to face facts, physics isn't as popular as mathematics, and the last thing we want to be doing right now is pushing it too far in a direction that will promote its demise, just as for the failed Theoretical Physics site.

  • Physics Q&A for active researchers, academics and students of physics 51 questions/day