Timeline for Ultimately, what will the Physics Stack Exchange Become? Are there long term goals?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2015 at 19:15 | answer | added | fffred | timeline score: -4 | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 22:11 | comment | added | Mike Dunlavey | Some very capable but controversial people have left the site. Personally, I'm more active on SO, and some of my posts are either very controversial or simply not understood, in spite of my efforts to explain. Some people need a thick skin to stay on sites like this, though it is a "society" of sorts. It's kind of boring when I get no comments, even if they're negative. BTW, I got a PhD in AI, and you have more faith in it than I do. It's kinda rested on its laurels the last 2-3 decades, Siri/Google notwithstanding. | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 2:57 | comment | added | Asker123 | Like what @Dirk Bruere said, we already have one from @Qmechanic! :) | |
| Nov 3, 2015 at 19:17 | answer | added | got trolled too much this week | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 31, 2015 at 1:32 | comment | added | Alfred Centauri | "Put the Physics Stack Exchange together with an AI machine and you have a super-physicist." Really? I'm not convinced. | |
| Oct 29, 2015 at 5:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/659606727990579200 | ||
| Oct 28, 2015 at 2:17 | comment | added | user36790 | world domination! Just like Skynet:P | |
| Oct 27, 2015 at 21:46 | answer | added | Count Iblis | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 27, 2015 at 17:51 | vote | accept | docscience | ||
| Oct 27, 2015 at 16:44 | answer | added | user56903 | timeline score: 49 | |
| Oct 27, 2015 at 14:34 | history | edited | Danu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Oct 26, 2015 at 23:01 | comment | added | Qmechanic Mod | Related: meta.physics.stackexchange.com/q/1096/2451 , meta.physics.stackexchange.com/q/5173/2451 | |
| Oct 26, 2015 at 22:56 | history | asked | docscience | CC BY-SA 3.0 |