Skip to main content
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

I won't guess at akeshetakeshet's motive for opening a new proposal (I fear that he dropped by during one of our outbreaks of pop-sci-quantum-philosophers), but I think the questions he envisions would be welcome here and that we have some expertise in these matters already on-baord.

I won't guess at akeshet's motive for opening a new proposal (I fear that he dropped by during one of our outbreaks of pop-sci-quantum-philosophers), but I think the questions he envisions would be welcome here and that we have some expertise in these matters already on-baord.

I won't guess at akeshet's motive for opening a new proposal (I fear that he dropped by during one of our outbreaks of pop-sci-quantum-philosophers), but I think the questions he envisions would be welcome here and that we have some expertise in these matters already on-baord.

added 508 characters in body
Source Link
Update a bit
Source Link

As the proposal is brand new it is hard to be sure, but my first inclination is to guess that everything (or at least very nearly everything) that is on-topic for the proposal will also be on-topic for Physics.SE.

Certainly the original two examples with one vote each

  • Will photoresist [X] work in process [Y], and if not why? (on-topic)
  • What is your favorite way to bake a vacuum chamber? (not a great example)

seem to in keeping with our practice on Physics.SE. The newly added example

  • How should I remove rust/stains from my optics table without compromising its flatness?

is well chosen to explore the possible seem between the two proposals. I would judge that to be on-topic on Physics>SE, but I am an experimenter. How do other's feel about this?


I will try to provide examples of several classes of experimental technique and applied physics questions from Physics.SE (and trying to select those that would be interesting to grad students and those further on in their careers in keeping with the proposal).

The Jargon (not generally discussed with undergrads)

Instrumentation, calibration, and technique

Data analysis & Computation

Collaboration skills and Culture

Physics Education at the Graduate Level and Up

Frankly there is not as much there as I (an experimenter, after all) would have hoped, but I claim that we are welcoming of these matters.


I won't guess at akeshet's motive for opening a new proposal (I fear that he dropped by during one of our outbreaks of pop-sci-quantum-philosophers), but I think the questions he envisions would be welcome here and that we have some expertise in these matters already on-baord.


Edit 5-Sept-2011: Since this discussion I have been trying to take note of those questions on Physics.SE that would be candidates for ExperimentalPhysics.SE (or whatever).

See:

I don't really know what light this sheds on the proposal. Clearly we are still getting very few greasy-handed practical experimental questions; whether that means there are few that people want to ask the internet of Physics.SE has chased away everyone who wants to ask them I do not know.

As the proposal is brand new it is hard to be sure, but my first inclination is to guess that everything (or at least very nearly everything) that is on-topic for the proposal will also be on-topic for Physics.SE.

Certainly the original two examples with one vote each

  • Will photoresist [X] work in process [Y], and if not why? (on-topic)
  • What is your favorite way to bake a vacuum chamber? (not a great example)

seem to in keeping with our practice on Physics.SE. The newly added example

  • How should I remove rust/stains from my optics table without compromising its flatness?

is well chosen to explore the possible seem between the two proposals. I would judge that to be on-topic on Physics>SE, but I am an experimenter. How do other's feel about this?


I will try to provide examples of several classes of experimental technique and applied physics questions from Physics.SE (and trying to select those that would be interesting to grad students and those further on in their careers in keeping with the proposal).

The Jargon (not generally discussed with undergrads)

Instrumentation, calibration, and technique

Data analysis & Computation

Collaboration skills and Culture

Physics Education at the Graduate Level and Up

Frankly there is not as much there as I (an experimenter, after all) would have hoped, but I claim that we are welcoming of these matters.


I won't guess at akeshet's motive for opening a new proposal (I fear that he dropped by during one of our outbreaks of pop-sci-quantum-philosophers), but I think the questions he envisions would be welcome here and that we have some expertise in these matters already on-baord.

As the proposal is brand new it is hard to be sure, but my first inclination is to guess that everything (or at least very nearly everything) that is on-topic for the proposal will also be on-topic for Physics.SE.

Certainly the original two examples with one vote each

  • Will photoresist [X] work in process [Y], and if not why? (on-topic)
  • What is your favorite way to bake a vacuum chamber? (not a great example)

seem to in keeping with our practice on Physics.SE. The newly added example

  • How should I remove rust/stains from my optics table without compromising its flatness?

is well chosen to explore the possible seem between the two proposals. I would judge that to be on-topic on Physics>SE, but I am an experimenter. How do other's feel about this?


I will try to provide examples of several classes of experimental technique and applied physics questions from Physics.SE (and trying to select those that would be interesting to grad students and those further on in their careers in keeping with the proposal).

The Jargon (not generally discussed with undergrads)

Instrumentation, calibration, and technique

Data analysis & Computation

Collaboration skills and Culture

Physics Education at the Graduate Level and Up

Frankly there is not as much there as I (an experimenter, after all) would have hoped, but I claim that we are welcoming of these matters.


I won't guess at akeshet's motive for opening a new proposal (I fear that he dropped by during one of our outbreaks of pop-sci-quantum-philosophers), but I think the questions he envisions would be welcome here and that we have some expertise in these matters already on-baord.


Edit 5-Sept-2011: Since this discussion I have been trying to take note of those questions on Physics.SE that would be candidates for ExperimentalPhysics.SE (or whatever).

See:

I don't really know what light this sheds on the proposal. Clearly we are still getting very few greasy-handed practical experimental questions; whether that means there are few that people want to ask the internet of Physics.SE has chased away everyone who wants to ask them I do not know.

added 315 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
added 69 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Post Made Community Wiki
Source Link
Loading