Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
May 7, 2016 at 0:09 comment added N. Virgo @CountIblis no, it's completely different, because referees aren't self-selecting.
May 6, 2016 at 16:25 comment added Count Iblis @Nathaniel Yes, one has to put personal interest aside, this may not be easy to do. So, I guess we do need objective criteria, but these criteria should be chosen to so that they end up making that judgment. It's not all that different from a Referee having to judge if a paper is sufficiently interesting for the journal's readership.
May 6, 2016 at 12:56 comment added N. Virgo I voted (-1) because I agree that this should not be on topic. But I disagree intensely with "focus only on how interesting a question is from purely a physics point of view". If we allow close votes based on being "not interesting", we will end up with only questions that are of interest to the very small minority who regularly vote to close. We should strive for clear criteria that minimise judgement calls, and where the calls that do need to be made are not on the basis of personal taste.
Apr 27, 2016 at 21:03 comment added sammy gerbil I like the approach of judging the question on its interest rather than rigidly applying criteria of effort and "check my answer". This question does raise some interest, judging by Farcher's comment.
Apr 18, 2016 at 13:16 history edited David ZMod CC BY-SA 3.0
add voting instructions
Apr 8, 2016 at 3:15 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Mod "Under the current policy this is allowed homework, because the OP did a reasonable effort to solve the problem." I don't think that is what the current policy says. It's a pure "do my work for me" question.
Apr 7, 2016 at 20:32 history answered Count Iblis CC BY-SA 3.0