Does anyone, any entity own copyright on the contents of the Physic's Stack Exchange Q&A that exist?
-
1$\begingroup$ related: Intellectual property on Physics SE. $\endgroup$– AccidentalFourierTransformCommented Aug 16, 2017 at 20:40
-
$\begingroup$ @AccidentalFourierTransform Thanks. That post actually contains a link to meta.stackexchange.com/q/13976/273490 which is the Stack Exchange in general as it relates to copyright. It looks like the website design and content are each covered differently. The content under wiki with attribute. $\endgroup$– docscienceCommented Aug 16, 2017 at 21:12
2 Answers
Yes, when you post any content to any Stack Exchange site you retain the copyright to that content, but you also grant irrevocable rights to the public, including Stack Exchange, as to how they can use that content.
More precisely, whenever you post any question, answer, or comment to the site, you are effectively doing three things:
- You're certifying that you're the creator of all the content that you post (or that any other content, such as images, is covered under fair use);
- You retain the copyright to that work; and
- You provide the work to the public, and as a subset of that to Stack Exchange, under a Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike (CC BY-SA) license.
This license enables Stack Exchange (along with everybody else) to distribute the work in any form they want to, and even charge for it if they so desire, so long as (i) they attribute the work to you, and (ii) they distribute it under the CC BY-SA license, or some compatible set of conditions.
This license is irrevocable: once you post here and the license is granted, you cannot demand that Stack Exchange delete the post, and indeed other people can put your content on other sites without you being able to stop them, so long as they follow the conditions of the license. If this makes you uncomfortable, you should not post here.
That said, you retain all other rights to the work not covered by the original license. Thus, you're able to e.g. sell the copyright to a publisher, or sue people who post it elsewhere and don't attribute it correctly, or indeed re-license it to the public under any other license (or combination of licenses) that you want to.
If you do find your content posted on other sites and you are unhappy with how it's presented (which does happen often enough) then the mother-meta post A site (or scraper) is copying content from Stack Exchange. What do I do? has good help on what to do.
Finally, it's important to note that the above only applies to user-provided content. The actual site design, logos, and other SE-built assets are owned by Stack Exchange, and cannot be reused (particularly for commercial purposes) without their authorization.
-
$\begingroup$ So then the Stack Exchange could, if they so desire to assemble the information content into a book that can be published and sold. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 17, 2017 at 14:37
-
$\begingroup$ That is correct. And so could you. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 17, 2017 at 19:22
-
$\begingroup$ @docscience there was an effort on physics here to publish a book of good answers (I'd link it, but on mobile currently--should be easily searchable) $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 11:11
-
$\begingroup$ @KyleKanos if you remember next time you are in front of a keyboard, please comment me a link. I just did a google search but too many "please recommend a book" questions associated with the PSE. The old needle in a haystack. Unless you can offer a more descriptive title than "book of good answer". Thanks $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 16:51
-
1$\begingroup$ @docscience search this meta for 'the best of SE book'. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 18, 2017 at 17:54
At the bottom of every page is a link labeled "Legal".
Among the things found there is the copyright policy. Like all sites in the Stack Exchange network submitting to Physics grants Stack Exchange a license to use your content under a Creative Commons license. See the legal page for details.
That means that the copyright has not been transferred, but that certain rights have been granted to Stack Exchange and to the public—the copyright holder can't prevent use of the content that is consistent with the license.