1
$\begingroup$

I have flagged quite a few posts and answers, 2 of which were spam flags and both were declined. Why? Isn't spam anything redundant and lengthy? For instance, if a person's answer is "hieeeeeeeeeeeeeeefiehfihfiehihefhehfie" some random letters like this, is this spam?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Spamming - Electronic spamming is the use of electronic messaging systems to send an unsolicited message (spam), especially advertising $\endgroup$ – Alfred Centauri Jan 10 '18 at 2:28
7
$\begingroup$

That is not spam.

On StackExchange, only posts that explicity advertise a specific website, program or product are considered spam. Gibberish should be flagged as either "not an answer" or "rude or abusive".

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I meant what should gibberish questions be flagged as. Sorry for misunderstanding $\endgroup$ – QuIcKmAtHs Jan 6 '18 at 2:30
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @XcoderX I explicitly said what gibberish posts should be flagged as. I don't understand your question. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jan 6 '18 at 2:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can neither flag it as not an answer, Nor rude or abusive, since it is a question $\endgroup$ – QuIcKmAtHs Jan 6 '18 at 2:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @XcoderX You can certainly flag questions as "rude or abusive". Please be more specific about the problems you encounter or I will stop responding to you. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jan 6 '18 at 2:33
  • $\begingroup$ Okay @ACuriousMind . I will keep that in mind. So such gibberish will be ‘abusive’, since you can’t say that it is ‘rude’. $\endgroup$ – QuIcKmAtHs Jan 6 '18 at 2:35
  • $\begingroup$ @XcoderX I'm puzzled by your response. The last sentence of my answer literally says that gibberish can be flagged as "rude or abusive". How did you deduce that it cannot be flagged as 'rude'? $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jan 6 '18 at 2:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I would add "very low quality" to the list of flag options. That's my flag of choice for such content. See also this question about flags $\endgroup$ – David Z Jan 6 '18 at 2:38
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidZ We've always had slightly different opinions on what the VLQ flag ist for ;) $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jan 6 '18 at 2:42
  • $\begingroup$ @XcoderX I literally have no idea what you are talking about. I said in my answer that gibberish can be flaggedas either "not an answer" or "rude or abusive", and yet your last three comments imply that you somehow concluded from this that gibberish isn't rude. I would be very interested to learn how you got from by statement that "you may flag gibberish as rude or abusive" to the idea that "gibbersih isn't rude". That doesn't follow from anything that was written, at all. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jan 6 '18 at 2:46
  • $\begingroup$ Let me clarify. I know what to flag a gibberish post as now. However, I would like to know why is there no flag for abusive only. I think gibberish is abusive, not rude though $\endgroup$ – QuIcKmAtHs Jan 6 '18 at 2:49
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @XcoderX Please direct questions about the types of available flags at Meta Stack Exchange instead of physics.SE, since this concerns all sites equally. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Jan 6 '18 at 2:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "I think gibberish is abusive, not rude though" That's why the flag is "Rude or abusive". $\endgroup$ – JMac Jan 6 '18 at 18:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .