4
$\begingroup$

In my question I ask for a reference that presents the recursive calculation of the HaMiDeW coefficients. The resource-recommendation tag seemed perfectly suitable to me, but both the tag and my request were removed by another user. In addition, I think that the intent of my post is not clear anymore. What do you think? Is the edit legitimate? If yes, can someone explain it to me please?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
4
$\begingroup$

Res. recom. qs are restricted on Phys.SE. They usually cannot be combined with other questions in the same post, but should be asked separately.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for explaining your reasoning. I don't quite understand yet: What "other questions" did I ask? $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Mar 21 at 9:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That would be the implicit question in the last sentence (v6): I think that even the computation of $[a_2]$ is very laborious and I am hoping that someone bothered to present it in some detail. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic Mod
    Mar 21 at 9:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Okay, maybe I should have said that the computation is laborious, since I am very confident that this is the case. And hence I do not expect that someone will present the calculation in an answer. That's why I thought that it is better to ask for references. $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Mar 21 at 10:10
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, in that case, try to reformulate it as a pure res. recom. q. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic Mod
    Mar 21 at 10:12
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, thank you for the feedback. $\endgroup$
    – Filippo
    Mar 21 at 10:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .