Just a note on your last comment. If you have any specific complaints about a moderator action which you are unhappy with, this meta is the place to voice them.
You need to be polite and reasonable, provide evidence for all your allegations, and keep the discussion civil. Additionally, you also need to understand that some moderators (which notably include user suspensions) are a private matter between the individuals involved and should be like this as part of the privacy policy that also protects you.
Given that, there are no repercussions for conducting a constructive discussion in meta. If you are unhappy about specific incidents, please express that in this meta! It does not help if you bottle it up until you wind up being blanket unhappy with a certain person. Improving this site begins with the everyday process of helping moderators understand what the community's opinions are. If you bring a specific issue to meta in a civilized way, you stand to gain a community discussion or even re-evaluation of site policy or at least a good understanding of what the issues are and why the policies are as they are. (And, if you're unhappy with policy, you can again bring that up, though if the community disagrees with you then you'll have to settle with agree-to-disagree.)
In here as in real life, don't wait until elections to exercise democracy.
whenever the community and the SE team decide that the moderation workload on the site exceeds what the current moderators can do.
The key word in your quote is "needs more moderators." $\endgroup$