Why this my question has been closed?


  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is unclear about the message given? $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Apr 21 '14 at 20:40
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Kyle Kanos well I replied to your message. For excample you claim that I suggest a non-interacting observer, which is untrue. Youyh simply did not readr the question throroughly. $\endgroup$ – Anixx Apr 21 '14 at 20:43
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Kyle Kanosn If youb thinik I postulated any fact not established by physics, please point at it in the answer. $\endgroup$ – Anixx Apr 21 '14 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ AFAICT, postulating facts from established physics and connecting them together to make up something fantastic does not mean that the statements are combined true. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Apr 21 '14 at 20:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Further, if your assessment were actually established fact, you would not be asking "Is this a valid interpretation." $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Apr 21 '14 at 20:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Kyle Kanos well I agree with your comment that connecting established facts does not make the combined statement necessary true. That's why was my question: is the connection between the facts was wrong, please tell me, where. $\endgroup$ – Anixx Apr 21 '14 at 20:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .