For users to progress with badges they have to criticise. Is there a worry that if the badge is earned by criticising someone with little background in the subject will put them off asking questions? Should the "critic" step be removed?

  • $\begingroup$ Which badge are you referring to? One requiring downvoting or something? $\endgroup$
    – tpg2114
    Commented Mar 27, 2016 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ The badge I am referring to is the critic badge. $\endgroup$
    – jim
    Commented Mar 27, 2016 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ BTW -- The moderators have some limited tools for detecting patterns of (possibly) targeted voting (in addition to the scripts that detect and reverse egregious cases). You account shown nothing. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 27, 2016 at 21:20

1 Answer 1


There seems to be two ideas behind the badges -- introduce people to concepts/tools/features of the site, and encourage people to do things that are needed but may be tedious. The Critic badge you refer to is the former, while badges encouraging X number of edits is the latter.

Downvotes are essential for the health of the website. It is how we distinguish between good and correct answers and bad, incorrect answers. There is no mechanism other than downvoting to establish if an answer is factually accurate. Comments could be left, but they are temporary. Flags are not supposed to be used for wrong answers and so they won't get deleted unless the original poster does so.

This leaves downvotes.

The badge does not say "Cast downvotes out of spite on a new user." Like all voting decisions, it leaves it up to each person to vote how they see fit. And that's a good thing. Hopefully somebody is using their downvote wisely and is contributing to the health of the site. If not, well, these things happen.

So like all of the badges, downvotes earn a badge because it is an essential feature of the site and can be tedious to go through and study questions and answers for their correctness and then vote accordingly. But it needs to be done, or the site dies off.

  • $\begingroup$ No, of course it would be wrong to cast down votes to spite a new user, but down votes are more likely to be cast against a new user. I think if you look at the statistics then this is what happens: New users can ask unrealistic questions. I have had some of my answers criticised with out being given the reason why, and I find that unhelpful. As well, I have seen factually correct answers being down graded. $\endgroup$
    – jim
    Commented Mar 27, 2016 at 15:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .