3
$\begingroup$

doesn't help characterize the physics content of a question. Sure, there are some questions that deal with (apparent) paradoxes, but I think it's enough that the question title or body mentions the paradox in question; there's no real need to make a tag out of it as well.

Does anyone else see a good use for this tag and would care to argue for keeping it? Or should we get rid of it?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Agreed. Right now [paradox] seems to mean "I'm lost on something basic". $\endgroup$ – dmckee Dec 17 '11 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ Agree as well. Get rid of it. $\endgroup$ – Antillar Maximus Dec 17 '11 at 20:53
1
$\begingroup$

Kill it with fire. Definitely.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Since there are only a few questions with the tag I've been removing it from them a few at a time. The opinion of mods is that it's not worth getting the devs involved for such a small tag. Let's just say that any time you see a paradox tag in the future, just edit it out. (If it becomes a problem, I think we can have it blacklisted) $\endgroup$ – David Z Dec 20 '11 at 20:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .