I was wondering how could I improve the question here: non abelian string in QCD? It looks to me the question is not too broad, all sub-questions are related.
But one of our moderators puts it on hold. Then I decided to remove the SUSY part.
Also I am not saying any moderator can be a dictator.
But it looks to me that a single person holds such a power to decide the fate of a question, and he/she also decides the fate of each individual user (for example, they may check your personal private data) -- this sounds to me like the big brother in George Orwell' 1984, wearing the dark glasses, watching all of us. Some of us can befriend to moderators to maintain a good connection to moderators and to each other, but not all of us prefer to do that.
Moderators may stay on the site for a longer period so knows some physics. But Who knows you or me or any of us may be a famous professor or Nobel laureates like t Hooft or Weinberg that simply asks a naive stupid question sometime? In this sense, a profound question can be easily on hold/closed by any moderator if he does not like it for any reason (or he does not understand it).
If this site is moderated by the moderators (who hold long term non-ending positions), then who are the people moderating the moderators? if the moderators hold too much power interfering the academic activity of site?
Of course, I understand that there are benefits to have moderators --- they also do good things, but they can also do the opposite, the bad for the site?
Does the freedom of moderators interfere the freedom of other users to ask greater questions?
I am asking people's opinion about the running of the site and how to get feedback on my question.