Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with discussion
Search options not deleted
user 184
The question you're asking is designed to solicit opinions or best-practices on a particular topic, with the goal of reaching community consensus.
6
votes
Polymath project equivalent for Physics?
If you see that:
there is some interest
and too much discussion/reformulation is involved for the frames of SE
then it may be worth to start a blog/wiki/... …
- 6,510
5
votes
Level of questions?
I totally agree.
While I enjoy answering simple questions and teaching others, I joined physics.stackexchange.com hoping for 'Mathoverflow for physicists'. The proposal says clearly 'Beta Q&A site fo …
- 6,510
6
votes
Quantitative Questions?
Usually when you can formulate well a quantitative questions, then you can answer it as well. Of course there may be exceptions, but well, no one forbids to ask them!
Existence of a definitive answer …
- 6,510
6
votes
Wikipedia like questions
People often ask general questions without even bothering to search Wikipedia (or Google).
I think it should be firmly discouraged (voting down/closing + writing this rule in FAQ) as:
It reduces …
- 6,510
4
votes
Is it appropriate to ask for criticism of a paper one is writing?
Personally, I would love to see more questions based on real research (and real publications). In fact, I can't imagine the better ones.
Of course, good one is asking if a proof can be simplified, or …
- 6,510
3
votes
New tag(s) for very basic questions?
There is already tag foundations (and it's not meta by any means). Just it is not used that much (yet?).
The problem you are addressing is very real, as most of simple questions can be asked on total …
- 6,510
21
votes
10
answers
1k
views
Where should research-level questions go? Theoretical Physics SE or Physics Research SE?
Discussion on Theoretical Physics - Area 51 - Stack Exchange (group proposal)
Post on Joe Fitzsimons' Blog
The main question are:
Who of you are interested in having general Physics Research SE rather …
- 6,510
12
votes
0
answers
571
views
Theoretical Physics SE - a place for research-level questions
Just recently, Theoretical Physics - Stack Exchange has entered the open beta phase. It is a research-level question site, so we aim at questions that cannot be answered by a standard textbook. We enc …
- 6,510
9
votes
7
votes
33
votes
1
answer
445
views
TagOverflow - an interactive graph of Physics.SE tags
I created a graph of tags from Stack Exchange sites (including Physics.SE), TagOverflow.
I made an interactive version of Map of 64 Tags from Physics.SE, with always up-to-date data.
Nodes represen …
- 6,510
10
votes
Can we get rid of the "philosophy" tag?
I disagree.
It often helps to understand if one asks about technical details of, for example, quantum measurement or "What is >the very meaning< of a quantum measurement?".
- 6,510
24
votes
1
answer
1k
views
Map of 64 Tags from Physics.SE
I've just made a map of tags for Physics.SE.
In short: tag size is related to tag popularity and edges are related to tag co-occurrences in questions.
For me it looks as a "snapshot" of topics and sco …
- 6,510