21

It isn't compulsory to accept an answer. If you feel that neither answer is acceptable then do not accept either of them. If you haven't received an answer that satisfies you then placing a bounty is the correct approach. It hasn't worked (so far) in this case, but that's the risk you run. It may simply be that none of the site members are experts in this ...


16

Accept the answer you find most helpful. It's your question, and the only criterion you need is how helpful you found the answer. It's not uncommon that someone will post an answer then someone else will post with more details, which can give you a difficult choice of who to accept. But the same criterion applies - accept the answer you liked best. You ...


16

Part of the problem is that we are not always sympathetic to questions from the less experienced physics fans. In this case the question had attracted two downvotes and no answers by the time I added my rather brief answer. So it's no surprise that when someone took time to write a detailed and apparently considered answer that answer would impress the OP ...


16

"Accept" - that little checkmark - does not mean "this answer is correct." It just means the author of the question accepted it. Hence the name. Folks accept all kinds of things. Things they find helpful, or reassuring, or funny, or insightful, or don't like but are convinced are unavoidable... Sometimes, folks accept the truth. But there's no guarantee ...


8

Nope. Especially since the OP deleted his/her account. Sorry about that; but the only person who can mark an answer as accepted is the OP.


8

it got no votes which I interpret as it has not been useful for anybody That's the wrong way to think about it. Just because an answer doesn't get voted on, it doesn't necessarily mean it was not useful to anyone - and perhaps more importantly, it doesn't mean it will not be useful to anyone in the future. If you post answers solely to get votes, you're on ...


8

I would personally suggest using the most upvoted answer, when compared to a negatively scored accepted answer. That is because the "Accepted Answer" only reflects what the person asking the question thought was the best answer. On the other hand, votes provide you with information about how good the community thinks any given answer is. That's not to say ...


7

I don't have the time to go look at your answers, but this happens all of the time. Sometimes posters of questions are here for a quick answer. Once they see something they like they don't up vote or choose an accepted answer, and often they are never seen again. Other times it depends on time of activity. Some questions just don't get a lot of views. Some ...


7

Well, technically you're allowed to accept any answer to your question that you want, and to change which answer is accepted as often as the system allows you to. If you want to be a "good Stack Exchange citizen", you should be reasonably sure that the answer you accept is correct. Sometimes there are multiple correct answers. Which one you choose to accept ...


6

Note that one of the bounty reasons is Authoritative reference needed Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources. I've always interpreted such bounties as evidence that the bounty-setter believes the existing answers, even if upvoted, are fatally flawed. Offering such a bounty has the dual effect of (a) implying that the ...


6

It's perfectly fine and even encouraged to remind a poster of SE etiquette, in particular that they should upvote helpful answers and accept the best one that directly answered their question, if there is one. But it's not OK to tell someone how to vote or which answer to accept. To take the actual example from the answer you're asking about, the comment ...


5

I came over to Physics SE on a lark from clicking a link in the sidebar on another SE site I spend time on. In Stack Overflow, I often will answer already questions with accepted answers to help add my point of view. Specifically, I'm Googling for something and the question and answer help me figure out my situation. So, I'll add my answer in the event ...


5

If you feel like two (or more!) answers deserve recognition, but you have only one green checkmark, you could reward the others with a bounty.


4

I've looked through all your zero-score answers, and the thing that I noticed first of all was not the quality of your answers: instead it's the quality of the questions. Notice how a sizable portion of the questions (5 out of 11) either are now closed, or have zero score. These factors influence number of views, which is less than 50 for each of these ...


4

Every post on our site requires a certain level expertise to evaluate. Sometimes that expertise is having completed primary school, sometimes it is having a dim recollection of high school physics, sometimes it is having studied a particular subfield of physics in depth. But you cannot understand any post about science if you do not share a basic framework ...


4

I really don't think this is a good idea. For starters, we already have a system established for determining which answers are good and bad. It's the voting system. If wrong posts are gaining more votes than correct ones, that would be a community issue. I'm not sure why we as a community would be able to overwhelmingly decide that an answer is bad if it ...


3

It is monitored, sort of. The community tends to self-police (at least on other SE sites, I haven't seen it too often here but I could just be missing it). In other words, person A asks a question and somebody comes along and leaves a comment "Hey, I would like to answer your question but you have a history of leaving answers unaccepted. If you accept ...


2

The answer which is "accepted" by the OP is merely that - the answer which the OP most approves of at the time. It is not intended to be the "best answer" and there is no guarantee that it is even "correct". It is true that a random searcher might wrongly assume the "accepted" answer is "correct." But that is ...


2

No, this is not an acceptable way of dealing with the situation. Specifically, you shouldn't delete the original text of your answer. The best thing to do, if you can, is to edit the answer to make it correct. Generally edits shouldn't substantially change what an answer is saying, but when the answer has been accepted you can take a bit more latitude to ...


1

Which answer should we accept if multiple answers address the question? The one that you think is the best. How you decide that is up to you. Should it be the one that was posted first (first come first served)? Not unless you absolute can't decide which answer to pick. Should it be the one that is the longest (cause the user put in more effort)? ...


1

I'm no specialist on what new-comers usually do and I can only speak for myself, but when I first came to this site, I was first magnetised by the list of highest voted answers and questions, not the lowest. Are you saying that there is a substantial percentage of highly-voted answers that are wrong ? Or are you saying that the community isn't engaging ...


1

I'm not sure I agree with this being necessary but let me do a premise: The accepted answer does not mean that "this answer is better", but rather that it's the one that helped the OP in his question/problem. Does it mean it's the best answer? Maybe, but maybe there's a solution the community likes more and that gets upvoted more. This doesn't mean the OP ...


1

Yes I agree that the top up-voted answers should be positioned before the answers with less up-votes.


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible