For a long time, I wanted to understand quantum mechanics. Then I grew older and learned other things which are badly counterintuitive. I also learned that the Copenhagen interpretation is no longer the last word, which I find quite comforting. (That comfort was based on the book Understanding Quantum Mechanics by Roland Omnès. I now know that it described the consistent histories interpretation, which doesn't really contradict the Copenhagen interpretation.) The Copenhagen interpretation itself is actually not as bad as I thought, but sadly many presentations mix it up with an interpretation proposed by Eugene Wigner that Wigner himself later retracted.
Member for 9 years, 3 months
15 profile views
Last seen Sep 30 at 5:28
- Mathematics 6.7k 6.7k 11 gold badge2020 silver badges6565 bronze badges
- Computer Science 5.2k 5.2k 2121 silver badges5757 bronze badges
- Philosophy 3.8k 3.8k 1818 silver badges3737 bronze badges
- Theoretical Computer Science 2.9k 2.9k 1414 silver badges4242 bronze badges
- MathOverflow 2.4k 2.4k 1515 silver badges3434 bronze badges
- View network profile
Top network posts
- 50 What are some very important papers published in non-top journals?
- 31 How did first-order logic come to be the dominant formal logic?
- 30 Proof refutation: Amateur reviews of ambitious CoRR papers
- 28 On mathematical arguments against Quantum computing
- 23 Mathematical research interrupted by a war
- 19 Nonequivalent definitions in Mathematics
- 19 Was von Neumann's 1954 ICM address "Unsolved Problems in Mathematics" outdated?
- View more network posts →