For a long time, I wanted to understand quantum mechanics. Then I grew older and learned other things which are badly counterintuitive. I also learned that the Copenhagen interpretation is no longer the last word, which I find quite comforting. (That comfort was based on the book Understanding Quantum Mechanics by Roland Omnès. I now know that it described the consistent histories interpretation, which doesn't really contradict the Copenhagen interpretation.) The Copenhagen interpretation itself is actually not as bad as I thought, but sadly many presentations mix it up with an interpretation proposed by Eugene Wigner that Wigner himself later retracted.
Member for 8 years, 9 months
15 profile views
Last seen Feb 26 at 22:40
- Mathematics 6.6k 6.6k 11 gold badge1818 silver badges6161 bronze badges
- Computer Science 5.1k 5.1k 2121 silver badges5656 bronze badges
- Philosophy 3.7k 3.7k 1818 silver badges3636 bronze badges
- Theoretical Computer Science 2.9k 2.9k 1313 silver badges4242 bronze badges
- MathOverflow 2.3k 2.3k 1515 silver badges3232 bronze badges
- View network profile
Top network posts
- 49 What are some very important papers published in non-top journals?
- 32 How did first-order logic come to be the dominant formal logic?
- 29 Proof refutation: Amateur reviews of ambitious CoRR papers
- 28 On mathematical arguments against Quantum computing
- 23 Mathematical research interrupted by a war
- 19 Is there an O(n log n) algorithm for 4D line simplification?
- 18 Is anyone aware of a counter-example to the Dharwadker-Tevet Graph Isomorphism algorithm?
- View more network posts →