Timeline for Sudden large drop in standing ("top percentage overall") without numeric change in "reputation"
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 6, 2020 at 21:15 | comment | added | Brick | At the recalculation the size of the pool of people who qualify over 200 rep would have (potentially) changed, and it's only 15 votes received difference from 200 to exceed 322. Could be 67% out of a much bigger pool many of who leapfrogged from not-qualified to > 322, in principle at least. But I agree now that the OP has allowed that the period in the message may have changed that @JMac probably had the right answer from the start. | |
Jan 6, 2020 at 20:26 | comment | added | Brick | @JMac There's also some nonsense about how they handle ties. Noted in comment under my answer. | |
Jan 6, 2020 at 20:24 | comment | added | JMac | But to change from 16% to 67% would require 51% of the users to have been affected enough by this change to pass the 322 point threshold as a result of the change. It's possible, but that does seem statistically pretty unlikely to me. | |
Jan 6, 2020 at 20:21 | history | answered | robMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |