Timeline for What is the value in making OPs 'answer it yourself'?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 30, 2014 at 22:33 | comment | added | Ehryk | It was, and is, about a specific physical phenomenon, which may have had a certain name I was unaware of through searching, and/or had a full treatment on elsewhere on the web, including calculations, frequency, possibility, and resulting effects. Ultimately this is what I'm after, and only did the math after the inability to find additional information on something that should have additional information already in existence. | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 22:10 | comment | added | Ehryk | My question could NOT be summarized as '"please solve this exercise" or "please plug these numbers into an equation for me"', that was only a small portion of the scope of the question, which I then answered myself, leaving the remaining elements of the question. | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 22:05 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | @Ehryk: Considered off topic by the community, as decided by the community. | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 22:04 | comment | added | Ehryk | Considered off-topic by WHOM? Does this speak for the entire community? | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 21:06 | history | answered | Kyle Kanos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |