Timeline for Why are one letters edits frowned upon? I often have single letter fixes for LaTeX code
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 at 23:15 | comment | added | raindrop | Perhaps stackexchange could let users with high reputation make single edits. Perhaps edits by people with high reputation would only need 1 approval instead of 2. Perhaps single letter edits should only require 1 approval instead of 2. | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 12:35 | comment | added | Martin Ueding | @Raindrop: Definitly. What what if I only see one edit? | |
| Feb 19, 2013 at 19:36 | comment | added | raindrop | Yeah think about all the time saved if everyone made two edits instead of one. Think abotu the time time saved | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 2:23 | comment | added | Manishearth Mod | Simply, there always is something else that you can fix. You are taking up the time of two approvers -- it is better to make it thorough. (Of course, for LaTeX edits not much time is taken; there isn't any need to read the whole post) | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 20:46 | answer | added | David ZMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 20:05 | history | asked | Martin Ueding | CC BY-SA 3.0 |