Timeline for "Duplicate" not a duplicate
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 3, 2017 at 1:06 | comment | added | WillO | I appreciate the thought you put into this, but I think you are objectively wrong when you say "I think you are making a distinction which does not actually exist in the questions. Neither specifies what the relative motion of the observers is." The alleged duplicate clearly and explicitly assumes that the "traveling" twin "left earth in a rocket" and is therefore traveling away from earth. The new question makes no such assumption. This is not a niggling difference; it completely changes the answer. | |
| Feb 2, 2017 at 21:07 | history | answered | sammy gerbil | CC BY-SA 3.0 |