Timeline for Request for establishing a new privilege: to undo a ban
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2012 at 18:54 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | @Arnold: that is indeed how it works for the effects shown on the profile page. Removing all auxiliary discussion is not so easily done (moderators will tend to remove unconstructive or obsolete discussions over time, but ideally folks would be encouraged to participate in more general, constructive discussion of policy that can inform and guide others in the future instead). | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 18:39 | comment | added | Arnold Neumaier | @Shog9: Then the reasons for the mark of Cain should be removed after the suspension is over, but not during suspension where the mark of Cain is very visibly imposed anyway | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 17:56 | comment | added | Shog9 Mod | Suspensions are private to avoid sticking someone with The Mark of Cain for a mistake they've later corrected, @Vineet. Of course, well-meaning colleagues repeatedly bringing it up in public sorta works against this, but... | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 17:45 | comment | added | Manishearth | @VineetMenon: The rules of the site are all public. Read them, you shall know how to avoid it. | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 17:34 | comment | added | Vineet Menon | Does anyone know why suspensions are private?? I mean shouldn't it bother the user of a SE site to know what made a person pariah? A citizen has every right to know who did what and how to avoid it!! | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 15:50 | comment | added | Arnold Neumaier | Users have all the details needed to judge that a member is essential for the community. This should be enough to redeeem a member when it fell into disfavor at superior instances. | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 15:13 | comment | added | Dilaton | No the only thing that counts to decide if the ban should be undone is the importance of the user to the local community. It is only about being able to contriute to the LOCAL site so undoing the ban should be the business and judgement of the local community and its mods alone. | |
| Dec 6, 2012 at 15:00 | history | answered | Mad Scientist | CC BY-SA 3.0 |