Timeline for Should we include other StackExchange sites in the close vote options?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 at 19:00 | history | edited | QmechanicMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 31, 2017 at 15:06 | comment | added | Jim | @EmilioPisanty Yeah, I thought that it's still enough for mods to handle, but then I thought that the number of Math.SE migrations is probably enough to handle as well. That kinda made it feel like a hollow argument, so I didn't bother mentioning it | |
| Mar 31, 2017 at 14:13 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | I'm not sure how I feel about this now - you can argue that 19 vs 39 is enough of a fraction that this should be considered, but you can also argue that it's still plenty manageable by mods (and then further argue that, given that, it's for mods to decide whether that workload is large enough to automate). It's interesting to note, though, that most of the EE rejections were migrated by mods or by users with a lot of SE experience. So, in conclusion, who knows! | |
| Mar 31, 2017 at 12:24 | comment | added | Jim | @WRICHIKBASU It may be of need, but I would say the use of the word "great" is something that could be debated. Let's see if anyone wants to weigh in again on this after 2 years | |
| Mar 31, 2017 at 12:23 | history | edited | Jim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated temporal relevance
|
| Mar 31, 2017 at 11:25 | comment | added | Wrichik Basu | This is of great need (including other SE sites as well) | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.physics.stackexchange.com/ with https://physics.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 15, 2014 at 13:19 | answer | added | Olin Lathrop | timeline score: -3 | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 5:32 | answer | added | Michiel | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 16:32 | comment | added | Jim | @DavidZ true enough. I apologize for my generalizations but it was due to an effort to be brief, not due to lack of forethought. I do mean homework-like in all cases, which I shortened to homework. However, as a Q&A site, I'd like to point out that the value of most questions can be interpreted as educational. But I recognize the point you were getting at was "how do I solve this specific problem" questions as opposed to "why is this aspect of the problem solved this way?" or others akin. | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 7:13 | comment | added | David Z Mod | Note that our homework close reason is actually for homework-like questions - anything where the value is meant to be educational. The fact that a question is not homework is not itself a valid reason not to use the homework-like close reason. | |
| Apr 9, 2014 at 20:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhysics/status/453987552325021696 | ||
| Apr 6, 2014 at 22:52 | answer | added | Emilio Pisanty | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 17:48 | history | edited | Jim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 790 characters in body
|
| Apr 6, 2014 at 17:26 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | @Jim: I concur. I've made a few custom close reasons involving EE.SE, I would not be opposed to that being a full reason for closure. | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 17:25 | comment | added | Jim | @KyleKanos and the answer was "we'll reconsider when compsci.SE graduates". Based on that, it seems discussing EE.SE and others is a fair idea | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 17:02 | comment | added | Kyle Kanos | Several months ago, I asked a similar question with regard to the SciComp.SE site. | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 15:16 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 15, 2014 at 22:13 | |||||
| Apr 6, 2014 at 15:02 | comment | added | Jim | plus I addressed the "too infrequent" part of the answer to that question. No, I agree to the closeness, but I'm clearly asking a question that would require a different type of answer | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 14:58 | comment | added | Jim | @jinawee possible, but I'd be against a "general box". It carries the same problem as the "other box" that we now have | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 14:56 | comment | added | jinawee | possible duplicate of Can the flag for migration be generalized? | |
| Apr 6, 2014 at 14:51 | history | asked | Jim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |